By Mark J. Magyar

Big question is whether Christie, Legislature set health-benefit payments or unions get back collective-bargaining rights

As Gov. Chris Christie’s Pension and Health Benefits Study Commission wrestles with the issue of how much public employees should pay toward their health insurance, New Jersey’s public-employee unions are focused not only on how much they will pay, but also on making sure they win back the right to collective bargaining on healthcare issues.

It is an issue that bitterly divided the Democratic Party and the labor movement four years ago, and its resolution poses political risks for Christie’s quest for the Republican presidential nomination and the expected gubernatorial candidacy of Senate President Stephen Sweeney (D-Gloucester).

Over the furious objections of union leaders, Chapter 78, the 2011 revision to the state’s pension and health benefits law, suspended collective bargaining on health coverage for four years, and required public employees to pay significantly more for their health insurance — from 3 percent for employees making under $25,000 to 35 percent for those making over $110,000.

As a result, the state’s public employees are now paying more out-of-pocket for individual health insurance policies and the 10th-highest amount for family coverage in the nation, and a higher percentage than many private sector employees in New Jersey, a NJ Spotlight analysis showed.

However, for state workers and about one-third of New Jersey’s teachers, police, firefighters, county and municipal employees that four-year mandatory payment schedule — and the four-year suspension of collective bargaining on health benefits — ends July 1, 2015.

Unless Christie and the Democratic-controlled Legislature pass new laws extending the current health payment schedule or imposing a new one, public-employee unions across the state will begin negotiations on new contracts with the Christie administration, local school districts, county freeholder boards, and municipal governments with the issue of health benefits back on the table.

More>>

Similar Posts