Category Archives: Higher Ed News

Christie proposes increased aid to higher education

By Mary Diduch and Jovelle Tamayo / Staff Writers

Gov. Chris Christie outlined his third annual budget address for the next fiscal year — with the intent to make New Jersey have an economic “comeback” with tax cuts and increased funding for certain government entities, like higher education.

The governor’s budget proposal — announced yesterday afternoon at the State House in Trenton — calls for a total of $32.15 billion for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013. His proposal represents a 3.7 percent increase in government spending from last year.

More>>

Lautenberg raises questions over proposed merger

U.S. Sen. Frank Lautenberg has raised questions over a proposed merger of two South Jersey colleges, including concerns over the impact on tuition costs and employment at the combined university.

Lautenberg raised his concerns in a letter today to Gov. Chris Christie, who has endorsed a controversial merger of Rutgers-Camden and Glassboro-based Rowan University.

In the letter, Lautenberg noted “the price of attending Rowan University is, on average, $5,000-$8,000 more than attending Rutgers-Camden.” Lautenberg then asked if the merger would boost tuition costs for current Rutgers-Camden students, and whether accommodations would be made for those who could not afford the higher cost.

Lautenberg also asked Christie to provide information about the mergers’ impact on the more than 600 employees at Rutgers-Camden, including union members and those with contracts. He also questioned the impact on federal funding at the schools and the expected status of other Rutgers facilities in South Jersey, including the Pinelands Field Station in New Lisbon.

More>>

Rule seen to discourage Rowan-Rutgers merger

Gov. Chris Christie has proposed merging Rutgers-Camden with Rowan University. / DOUGLAS BOVITT/Courier-Post file

Gov. Chris Christie has proposed merging Rutgers-Camden with Rowan University. / DOUGLAS BOVITT/Courier-Post file

An executive order to force the realignment of the state’s universities is precluded by state statute, according to legal expert Ronald T. Chen.

An exemption known as 18A:3B-36 requires “specific enabling legislation” for the reorganization of state institutions of higher education any time after July 1, 1994.

It throws a monkey wrench into potential plans by Gov. Chris Christie to sign an executive order forcing a series of changes he endorses.

“My take is the governor cannot do this under the reorganization act,” said Chen, noting that Christie is still free to seek legislative approval for plans to fold the University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey, including the School of Osteopathic Medicine in Stratford into Rutgers University, and merging Rutgers-Camden with Rowan University under the Rowan banner.

More>>

Dr. Cornel West Speaks on Student Debt Week of Action

We had the opportunity to see Dr. West in person. He wanted to pass on the importance of participating in the United States Student Association and the Student Labor Action Project’s Week of Action. In 2012 student debt will reach 1 trillion dollars, meaning we are students with no jobs, mortgage size loans and no homes.

Business school dean: Rutgers-Rowan merger ‘started off with the wrong question’

By Melinda Caliendo

The dean of Rutgers University School of Business-Camden said the state can set the standard for a national model of education only if leaders start asking the right business questions.

“Trying to merge two very different entities with different plans together is a very simplistic solution to a complex problem,” said Jaishankar Ganesh, also professor of marketing at the school. “I think we started off with the wrong question — should we be merging Rutgers and Rowan is the wrong question. Given the goal, the question should be how can we create a situation where we maximize value and educational opportunities, and lifetime earning potential, in South Jersey.”

More>>

Obama takes tougher stance on higher education

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON  — Access to college has been the driving force in federal higher education policy for decades. But the Obama administration is pushing a fundamental agenda shift that aggressively brings a new question into the debate: What are people getting for their money?

FILE PHOTO President Obama

FILE PHOTO President Obama

Students with loans are graduating on average with more than $25,000 in debt. The federal government pours $140 billion annually into federal grants and loans. Unemployment remains high, yet there are projected shortages in many industries with some high-tech companies already complaining about a lack of highly trained workers.

Meanwhile, literacy among college students has declined in the last decade, according to a commission convened during the George W. Bush administration that said American higher education has become “increasingly risk-averse, at times self-satisfied, and unduly expensive.” About 40 percent of college students at four-year schools aren’t graduating, and in two-year programs, only about 40 percent of students graduate or transfer, according to the policy and analysis group College Measures.

College drop-outs are expensive, and not just for the individual. About a fifth of full-time students who enroll at a community college do not return for a second year, costing taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars annually, according to an analysis released last fall by the American Institutes for Research.

There’s been a growing debate over whether post-secondary schools should be more transparent about the cost of an education and the success of graduates. President Barack Obama has weighed in with a strong “yes.”

More>>

Who needs college anyway?

BY WILL BUNCH, Philadelphia Daily News

With the sluggish economy, many college students, struggling to find work - such as these, at Temple University - are, instead, turning to graduate school in hopes that the extra level of education will make the difference, or postpone the pain.

With the sluggish economy, many college students, struggling to find work - such as these, at Temple University - are, instead, turning to graduate school in hopes that the extra level of education will make the difference, or postpone the pain.

PRESIDENTIAL hopeful Rick Santorum thinks it’s “intellectual snobbery” to say that every American should go to college. But tell that to Bob Stewart, of Northeast Philadelphia. After steady union work dried up a few years ago, a diploma became his quest for survival.

“Everything needed a college degree,” said Stewart, who admits that he’d been an indifferent student at Archbishop Ryan. He joined the steamfitters’ union in the 1990s, even as blue-collar work for high-school grads was vanishing.

Now 34, married with two kids, Stewart – seeking a steady paycheck close to home – finally bit the bullet three years ago and enrolled at Community College of Philadelphia while tending bar at night. He became editor of the student newspaper and is set to enroll in Temple’s journalism program in the fall – but he still feels conflicted about employers who demand that sheepskin.

“I definitely think that you shouldn’t need college,” said Stewart, who believes that more employers could stress on-the-job training - as unions did in their heyday – in lieu of four-year colleges with their exorbitant tuition that’s saddled middle-class students with massive debt.

When you run down the list of major issues in a typical U.S. presidential election, college – who goes and who pays? – traditionally didn’t make the cut. But 2012 is different.

A major breakdown in the social contract – in which college grads were all but guaranteed jobs, and opportunities still existed for those without higher education – has left many American voters confused, angry and looking for answers.

More>>

Community leaders want outside probe into surveillance of Muslim groups

BY PATRICIA ALEX, STAFF WRITER, THE RECORD

The New York Police Department’s surveillance of Muslim groups at Rutgers University has prompted community leaders to call for an outside investigation into whether the police had either the jurisdiction or the probable cause to target the New Jersey groups.

Muslim leaders say they are drafting a letter to the state Attorney General’s office asking for its own probe of the NYPD’s investigation.

“We encourage them to investigate this spying,” said Aref Assaf, president of the Paterson-based American-Arab Forum. Assaf said at least a half dozen advocacy groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union, are working together on the request.

More>>

Christie must remove Kean University’s President Dawood Farahi

SALVATORE PIZZURO

SALVATORE PIZZURO

Academic integrity is a hallmark of the credibility of any university. The standards for academic achievement and scholarly research must be universally expected of all faculty and top tier administrators. An institute of higher learning cannot expect to impart solid academic standards among students unless those who educate them lead by example.

This is one of the reasons why colleges and universities have zero tolerance for plagiarism, for example. There must be integrity in the papers and studies that college personnel present to the public. Simply, one cannot lead by edict; one can only lead by example.

This concept is one of the reasons why the recent and current events at Kean University are so disheartening for New Jersey and all of academia. The University is not leading by example and, as a consequence, all New Jersey higher education has taken a backward step that places our academic and administrative integrity in jeopardy. We cannot expect to be respected by other states unless we can clean our own house.

Furthermore, the value of an education from a New Jersey institution has been devalued.

Kean University President Dawood Farahi was accused of, and admitted, misrepresenting himself and his academic record when he applied for the position in 2003.

More>>

Kean University must end drama over President Dawood Farahi resume

The probe into Dawood Farahi’s résumé is over. The Kean University president has taken responsibility for errors that appeared in several early versions of his résumé. Despite the findings, Kean trustees last week voted 7-4, with one abstention, to keep him in office. That has many faculty and students in an uproar. They want Farahi ousted.

But to keep up this fight now will only hurt students and the university. The Kean faculty union pushed for the board probe, and it should abide by the board’s decision. There was no guarantee the board would see the errors as conclusive evidence that Farahi was ill-suited to be president. In fact, the board characterized the decades-old errors as “carelessness.”

More>>

Powered by Union Labor